Based on Comparables, ParkerVision
is Worth $4 Million
Based on 2004 sales of $0.44M and 2005 sales of $0.8M, projected annually, we
estimate a best case revenue scenarios of $1M in 2006 and $2M in 2007. Because
ParkerVision has never been profitable, we cannot apply the standard price-to-earnings
ratio (P/E), but can only apply the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio. In the
past, ParkerVision has enjoyed significant overvaluation:
- in early 2005, the market cap reached $200 million, with 2004
revenues of $0.44M, namely a P/S ratio of 454, while
- the present valuation has returned to $200M, with projected
2005 revenues of $0.8M, namely a P/S ratio of 250.
By comparison, industry leaders trade at P/S ratios of 1.0 to
6.8, with an industry average of 2.7. Two comparable companies
in the RF PA space are:
- RF Micro Devices (RFMD) traded at a 1.5 P/S ratio in early
2005, and trades at 1.56 today,
- Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) traded at a 1.4 price/sales ratio
in early 2005 and trades at 1.02 today.
Broadcom (BRCM), which is much more diversified, trades at the
highest P/S which is 6.8 on $16.73B of revenue, and a net income
of $288M.
Based on these comparables and the industry average P/S ratio
of 2.7, ParkerVision should be valued at $2.7M today and should
trade at $.13 per share, based on 20.91M million outstanding shares.
Finally, given that the entire RF PA market size is around $1B
with an expected annual growth rate of about 5%, the market capitalization
for a company having 100% market share would only be $2.7B. Even
in the unlikely scenario that ParkerVision was able to capture
10% marketshare, the company market value would still only be $270M,
namely $12.91. At its current prices, the company is close
to its potential peak valuation, with a high risk that if it cannot
execute on its predictions, the stock price will decrease. Therefore,
an investment in ParkerVision at this point in time is very high
risk, for fairly little reward.
Furthermore, ParkerVision stock has a natural tendency to decrease
in value when not artificially supported. Prior to a private
placement, the stock is usually hyped on the Yahoo Bulletin Board
and manipulated to maximize its price. After each private
placement (see Fund Raising History) the stock quickly drops to
$4 or less, at which point the current investors (see Investors
section) begin to support it, and gradually manipulate it upwards
for another fund raising event.
Assumptions on Revenue Projections
We anticipate
that ParkerVision will not achieve a meaningful OEM design win
with a large cell phone manufacturer in 2006. Namely,
to quote Jeff Parker, the company will remain “in discussions” with
their customers, without tangible commitments. Therefore,
we anticipate that the revenue for 2007 will not exceed $2M, and
that the operating loss will exceed $10M (we estimate it at $15M
to $20M based on historical trends). Again, using the comparable
P/S ratio, we estimate a fundamental market cap of $5.4M, which
correspond to a share price of $0.26. Therefore, the stock
at its current valuation of $9-11 is overpriced for the long term.
Furthermore, because the company will need to raise new operating
capital, historically around $20-30M in a private placement, not
only will current investors suffer dilution (estimated at 10%-20%,
depending on the amount of money raised, the discount/warrant deal
structure and the stock price), but new investors will most likely
suffer future dilution, because the capital infusion will most
likely not carry the company through breakeven. Moreover,
the company has a low probability of an alternative exit strategy,
such as an acquisition, given its past inability to gain interest
from any leading chip maker in its market. Based on discussions
with existing RF chip manufacturers, it is our understanding that
the probability of an acquisition is exceedingly low.
For a company with a consistent 15-year history of failure, including
unproven management, poor financial performance, and exaggerated
product announcements, ParkerVision is extremely overvalued. Therefore,
the potential return on an investment in ParkerVision is breakeven
at best, with a high potential of a negative return if the current
dearth in revenue continues. |
|